The End of The Ladder

Jon Allen’s „Para­gon“ ist fine. It is a real advance­ment in „Signed Folded Card to Clear Box“. I like it, because my LAGER Switch was instru­men­tal in that. So I was sort of instru­men­tal in the exis­tence of „Para­gon“ as well. Fine fee­ling, makes me a bit proud. Tick­les the ego. Here is what peo­ple say:

„Wow! Wow! Wow! I’m com­ple­tely foo­led! This is the only way peo­ple should do this trick!“ — Nicho­las Einhorn

„You bas­tard!“ — Wayne Dobson

„Awe­some! I *really* like it!“ — Michael Weber

„Para­gon is finally it. Job done. Now ever­yone can stop thin­king of new methods for the card in clear box. Jon Allen won.“ — Mark Elsdon

Well – nice quo­tes from nice peo­ple. Surely helps with the sales of the trick, which is good for ever­y­body. It would seem that there is not­hing to top that. Not­hing that com­pa­res with it. The end of the lad­der is rea­ched. Or is it?

But is it really the only way peo­ple should per­form that trick? I don’t think so.

Is there really not­hing else? I don’t think so.

End of the lad­der rea­ched? I don’t think so.

For me, there could be a lot more after that end of the lad­der: Show the clear box on the outstret­ched (empty) hand, hold it in front of spec­ta­tor, have him remove the lid, have him take out the folded card. That simple. Dump (pun inten­ded) the Switch. This is the end of my lad­der at the moment …

Impos­si­ble?

No.

I do have a way for that (unpu­blished and under­ground). Had it long before I crea­ted the LAGER Switch“. Chan­ged the moment. Clas­sic Erd­nase quote. But it works. Chan­ged the thin­king, the attack on the trick and mecha­nics fol­lo­wed natu­rally. It works. Thin­king out of the box (in that case, a won­derful pun, and inten­ded!) made it.

Ver­non was right with his „Magi­ci­ans tend to stop thin­king too early.“

I agree. Never ever stop thinking …